Saturday, 15 December 2012
Thursday, 6 December 2012
Sunday, 2 December 2012
Side by side
Side by side is an American documentary which investigates the progression of the film industry through history. The film covers all aspects of both digital and photochemical film creation and what has been able to be accomplished through the use of these two devices.
What are the positives of digital film making?
Through the creation of digital film it has meant that how films are created and presented to an audience can and has been evolved, and digital film has allowed things that couldn't be done with film now being able to be accomplished such as being able to see the process of what you have been recording instantly and communicating with actors whilst filming. Digital camera also allowed more material to be on camera and with the invention of wide screen, more could be fitted on a screen.
When digital film making came into perspective it had an advantage which was the cost, as it was cheap it allowed multiple camera to be purchased and set up to capture all elements of a scene when resulted in a lower budget needed thus more money could be spend on other aspects of the film.
Since digital film was so convenient through the small handheld camera's it meant filming could be conventional and you could capture footage illegally. Due to the speed in which things could be filmed it allowed everything to be done quickly thus reducing chaos for example during the filming of 28 days later Boyle needed to stop traffic in order to get the shots, this was able to be accomplished in a short period of time due to the use of a digital camera.
A strong advantage digital had was the fact it didn't cost anything to reproduce the film thus resulting in less money being spend.
With the creation of digital filming came digital effects which had no limits which therefore allowed any vision of film to become a reality and due to the high resolution of the camera it allowed these effects to look as realistic as possible through the advanced and flexible techniques of the editing. With digital colour correction a film became even more sophisticated and portrayed more emotions and allowed the desired look to be given.
What are the negatives of digital film making?
The opinion in which people have on digital film making result in it being seen as a negative, these opinions mainly consist of digital film resulting in the end of film, which can be hard for film makers to emotionally detach themselves from film as it is what they used originally.
Digital in the film industry was considered to looked 'amateur' and 'muddled' which simply meant that digital representation didn't look acceptable. Another problem digital portrayed was the digital image wasn't as good as film and also digital cropped out sections of the image in order to fit it on screen.
Digital also had storage flaws which created risk as the film could be lost. Copyright could also come into play simply because of the advanced effects, which meant anyone could manipulate a films effects and completely change how it was originally meant to be seen.
What are the positives of film stock?
A positive of filming with film stock is the excitement which in created due to the process of having to wait over night to see the production, film makers enjoy this excitement as it makes the film become more special. The acting is also effected when shooting on film stock due to the pressure of getting a performance perfect as each take counts, this resulted in better and serious acting.
The fact certain objects needed to be created in order to have effects on film, such as models, gave a sense of satisfaction to the creator as is meant it was all more personal and gave more reason for them to be proud of the creation of the film.
Film could be layered which acted as a positive thing due to it giving different effects to the production, thus resulting in film having a beautiful look to it.
What are the negatives of film stock?
Since no new camera's re being developed for film it means that the technology is limited thus it is likely to be on the brink of extinction. This also means nothing can be added to the camera's provided due to them being unable to evolve into something far greater.
The special effects for film stock were also very limited which meant the visual representations the creators hope for wouldn't be able to be constructed into the film, which made film harder to sculpt into looking good. The editing for film consisted of only colour balance which mean only the red, blue, green and yellow could be modified. Due to this limitation in editing it meant hardly anything could be done and the colour wanted couldn't be created.
Since film camera's had a large expense and multiple cameras were needed this meant the budget for a film had to be drastically increased in order to shoot the film. This is meant filming on film stock was risk as if the film flopped it meant a larger portion of money was lost.
Film was also risky simply because the process of filming couldn't be seen as the shoot was happening, and since film makers had to wait 24 hours to see the process it created more pressure because if it is not right it could possibly not be ready by the deadline.
How has digital changed the way in which films are consumed/watched?
Digital has changed the way simply are consumed simply because of the evolution into modern techniques. The fact digital allowed 3D to be created meant a new and exciting way for a film could be consumed which created a new unique selling point for film makers. This was clearly successful due to avatar, Alice in wonderland and how to train your dragon being the biggest grossing films of that year.
As digital cameras allowed awkward shots to be filmed it meant film could be seen in a new and exciting way as new angles which had never been seen were portrayed. This resulted in certain film becoming visual manifests through the creative cinematography.
Digital allowed the quality in which films were shown in cinema to be better thus resulting in a better experience for the consumers simply because of the pristine picture and everything being captured as it is seen.
Digital allowed modern and sophisticated effects to be introduced which was a big advantage to fantasy films as it allowed things which couldn't be shot come to life. This completely altered how people had seen films before as they had never seen anything like it which created a sense of amazement for an audience.
What do you think about the impact digital technology has had on the film industry?
The creation of digital film making has had a big impact on the film industry as it allows any idea to become possible for example avatar. Digital has also allowed a cheaper budget which means film industries have been able to make more money from creating films and in a shorter period of time. With the creation of 3D it meant film industries could push there boundaries into something which is realistic for an audience due it being captured how eyes see.
I personally think digital has had a huge impact simply due to the image quality as being a fan of pristine picture means the creation of blu ray was a huge attraction for me and others. With the creation of blu ray it meant an audience could get amazing quality in the comfort of their own home for a price with is reasonably in their price range.
The editing which came with digital had a huge impact on bot film makers and the consumers. This is due to the creation of new way of viewing films. The editing allowed an image to be modified to any extent needed, which created a representation which could be as realistic or as far fetched as a film maker intended The effect this had on a consumer was that they could appreciate just how pleasing a film was presented visually and made the eye sores be destroyed thus a better experience was formed.
What do you think will happen in the film industry as a result of digital technology within the next 5 years?
I personally think film is only going to evolve simply due to the amount which can be done with the creation of technology. I think he film industries will be able to soon go all out and be able to present their film to an audience in any way they intend. However, I also think digital can only evolve so much until it reaches a dead end which could be a deal breaker for film makers as money is likely to be lost for the film industry which could result in the end of films. Hopefully whatever is yet to come for example to perfection of a film picture on televisions will be enough for an audience to stay engaged with the idea of films.
I personally think the resolution for films will increase which will result in a new television which will match the resolution to the film thus creating a flawless and perfected picture for a film instead of what an audience has to deal with today which is grey blacks due to modern TV's pixels only dimming as apose to completely switching off. This is enable films to still live strong as the consumer will still have satisfaction in watching films.
I think the film industry will be able to expand their creativity to create a new unique selling point for a film like 3D and 4D which will appeal to a wider range of audience thus keeping the entertainment aspect of film alive. Perhaps an interactive element will be introduced to film which will allow the audience to become part of the film thus resulting in the film industry to grow stronger due to a consistent amount of money they will make.
What are the positives of digital film making?
Through the creation of digital film it has meant that how films are created and presented to an audience can and has been evolved, and digital film has allowed things that couldn't be done with film now being able to be accomplished such as being able to see the process of what you have been recording instantly and communicating with actors whilst filming. Digital camera also allowed more material to be on camera and with the invention of wide screen, more could be fitted on a screen.
When digital film making came into perspective it had an advantage which was the cost, as it was cheap it allowed multiple camera to be purchased and set up to capture all elements of a scene when resulted in a lower budget needed thus more money could be spend on other aspects of the film.
Since digital film was so convenient through the small handheld camera's it meant filming could be conventional and you could capture footage illegally. Due to the speed in which things could be filmed it allowed everything to be done quickly thus reducing chaos for example during the filming of 28 days later Boyle needed to stop traffic in order to get the shots, this was able to be accomplished in a short period of time due to the use of a digital camera.
A strong advantage digital had was the fact it didn't cost anything to reproduce the film thus resulting in less money being spend.
With the creation of digital filming came digital effects which had no limits which therefore allowed any vision of film to become a reality and due to the high resolution of the camera it allowed these effects to look as realistic as possible through the advanced and flexible techniques of the editing. With digital colour correction a film became even more sophisticated and portrayed more emotions and allowed the desired look to be given.
What are the negatives of digital film making?
The opinion in which people have on digital film making result in it being seen as a negative, these opinions mainly consist of digital film resulting in the end of film, which can be hard for film makers to emotionally detach themselves from film as it is what they used originally.
Digital in the film industry was considered to looked 'amateur' and 'muddled' which simply meant that digital representation didn't look acceptable. Another problem digital portrayed was the digital image wasn't as good as film and also digital cropped out sections of the image in order to fit it on screen.
Digital also had storage flaws which created risk as the film could be lost. Copyright could also come into play simply because of the advanced effects, which meant anyone could manipulate a films effects and completely change how it was originally meant to be seen.
What are the positives of film stock?
A positive of filming with film stock is the excitement which in created due to the process of having to wait over night to see the production, film makers enjoy this excitement as it makes the film become more special. The acting is also effected when shooting on film stock due to the pressure of getting a performance perfect as each take counts, this resulted in better and serious acting.
The fact certain objects needed to be created in order to have effects on film, such as models, gave a sense of satisfaction to the creator as is meant it was all more personal and gave more reason for them to be proud of the creation of the film.
Film could be layered which acted as a positive thing due to it giving different effects to the production, thus resulting in film having a beautiful look to it.
What are the negatives of film stock?
Since no new camera's re being developed for film it means that the technology is limited thus it is likely to be on the brink of extinction. This also means nothing can be added to the camera's provided due to them being unable to evolve into something far greater.
The special effects for film stock were also very limited which meant the visual representations the creators hope for wouldn't be able to be constructed into the film, which made film harder to sculpt into looking good. The editing for film consisted of only colour balance which mean only the red, blue, green and yellow could be modified. Due to this limitation in editing it meant hardly anything could be done and the colour wanted couldn't be created.
Since film camera's had a large expense and multiple cameras were needed this meant the budget for a film had to be drastically increased in order to shoot the film. This is meant filming on film stock was risk as if the film flopped it meant a larger portion of money was lost.
Film was also risky simply because the process of filming couldn't be seen as the shoot was happening, and since film makers had to wait 24 hours to see the process it created more pressure because if it is not right it could possibly not be ready by the deadline.
How has digital changed the way in which films are consumed/watched?
Digital has changed the way simply are consumed simply because of the evolution into modern techniques. The fact digital allowed 3D to be created meant a new and exciting way for a film could be consumed which created a new unique selling point for film makers. This was clearly successful due to avatar, Alice in wonderland and how to train your dragon being the biggest grossing films of that year.
As digital cameras allowed awkward shots to be filmed it meant film could be seen in a new and exciting way as new angles which had never been seen were portrayed. This resulted in certain film becoming visual manifests through the creative cinematography.
Digital allowed the quality in which films were shown in cinema to be better thus resulting in a better experience for the consumers simply because of the pristine picture and everything being captured as it is seen.
Digital allowed modern and sophisticated effects to be introduced which was a big advantage to fantasy films as it allowed things which couldn't be shot come to life. This completely altered how people had seen films before as they had never seen anything like it which created a sense of amazement for an audience.
What do you think about the impact digital technology has had on the film industry?
The creation of digital film making has had a big impact on the film industry as it allows any idea to become possible for example avatar. Digital has also allowed a cheaper budget which means film industries have been able to make more money from creating films and in a shorter period of time. With the creation of 3D it meant film industries could push there boundaries into something which is realistic for an audience due it being captured how eyes see.
I personally think digital has had a huge impact simply due to the image quality as being a fan of pristine picture means the creation of blu ray was a huge attraction for me and others. With the creation of blu ray it meant an audience could get amazing quality in the comfort of their own home for a price with is reasonably in their price range.
The editing which came with digital had a huge impact on bot film makers and the consumers. This is due to the creation of new way of viewing films. The editing allowed an image to be modified to any extent needed, which created a representation which could be as realistic or as far fetched as a film maker intended The effect this had on a consumer was that they could appreciate just how pleasing a film was presented visually and made the eye sores be destroyed thus a better experience was formed.
What do you think will happen in the film industry as a result of digital technology within the next 5 years?
I personally think film is only going to evolve simply due to the amount which can be done with the creation of technology. I think he film industries will be able to soon go all out and be able to present their film to an audience in any way they intend. However, I also think digital can only evolve so much until it reaches a dead end which could be a deal breaker for film makers as money is likely to be lost for the film industry which could result in the end of films. Hopefully whatever is yet to come for example to perfection of a film picture on televisions will be enough for an audience to stay engaged with the idea of films.
I personally think the resolution for films will increase which will result in a new television which will match the resolution to the film thus creating a flawless and perfected picture for a film instead of what an audience has to deal with today which is grey blacks due to modern TV's pixels only dimming as apose to completely switching off. This is enable films to still live strong as the consumer will still have satisfaction in watching films.
I think the film industry will be able to expand their creativity to create a new unique selling point for a film like 3D and 4D which will appeal to a wider range of audience thus keeping the entertainment aspect of film alive. Perhaps an interactive element will be introduced to film which will allow the audience to become part of the film thus resulting in the film industry to grow stronger due to a consistent amount of money they will make.
Friday, 23 November 2012
Friday, 16 November 2012
Pans Labyrinth
“Being a woman entails having within one’s body a secret
labyrinth of power and mystery”
Chosen question – Pan’s Labyrinth represents women in a
negative stereotypical way
Throughout the film women are represented in a stereotypical
way, they are seen as weak and incapable of a man’s role this is mainly to add
a sense of realism to the film as the way women are treated in the film is
suitable to the time period in which the film is set. The first indication of
the negative representation is in the opening, a girl is lying on the ground dying;
this portrays a sense of defeat and shows women as being unable to overcome an
enemy or dangerous situation. A close up of shot is used to emphasise this as
it shows the pain in which the character is in resulting the audience assuming
she has failed in what she intended to do.
The fact a character is shown to be pregnant adds to the
stereotypical role of women which is to take care of the children. Throughout
this pregnancy the Mother falls ill; this illness represents women having a
lack of vitality as it shows they don’t have the strength to fight of something
as minuet as an illness. The fact the Mother dies during child birth has a
dramatic effect on the audience as it creates the impression she was over
powered by the baby who happens to be male which creates subliminal sexism as
it shows that men have more importance and to live.
Women also appear to be cowardly, this is clearly shown
through the dialogue for example Ofelia reveals to her mother she is afraid.
This creates a negative impression of women as it portrays women don’t have the
courage to do heroic deeds thus representing them as the weaker sex.
The film represents women to be lower class than men, this
is seen through both the costumes they wear and how they act throughout the
film. The costumes contrast drastically with what the men in the film wear. The
colours of the women’s costumes mainly consist of browns and off white tones
which give their appearance a peasant look as they seem to all be wearing rags.
Whereas the men are smartly dressed in uniforms complete with blues and black
tones which connote masculinity and power. The way the women are spoken to by men is very
blunt and disrespectful and is often commands as the women follow the orders of
men and appear to be servants. The captain asks Mercedes to fetch the luggage,
this represents women as being flimsy as she doesn’t question or refuse to
answer to his authority which shows the immense amount of respect the women have
for men. The fact the insect in the film is female also creates an impression
of women being a lower ranking than humans in the film as insects are seen to
have no importance. It also however adds to the stereotype of women guiding the
children as the insect is what leads Ofelia to where she is supposed to be.
It is stereotypical for women to work in the kitchen and
this is the case in this film, most of the time when the women are being
displayed they are either cooking or cleaning. The effect of this is that women
are almost talentless as these tasks are basic factors of living and especially
considering the men are fighting which creates contrast between the roles of
men and women. This adds to a negative representation of women as it not only
shows them as having less capability than men but also shows them as being
slightly less academic as the tasks they undertake require very little skill
and knowledge.
The weather is another key indicator of a negative representation
of women. The fact it rains on Ofelia when she is undergoing a task portrays
her as being helpless and creates a sense of misery as it appears women are
stuck following orders, as even though she is doing something which is seen to
be empowering she is still following orders from the male gender. It also
suggests to the audience that women are lonely which a common representation.
Rain is often associated with loneliness or depression thus the weather can be
used to foreshadow the death of Ofelia’s mother as it results in women being
represented as emotional, which is seen to be a weakness and this is yet
another stereotypical aspect of women.
The men in the film see women as being non-threatening this
is clear to see due to the captain’s dialogue ‘She’s just a woman’ this comes
across insulting as it makes women appear completely powerless and have no
capability.
Women are also represented as naïve and irresponsible, this
is shown through Ofelia eating the fruit which she was told not to eat. This is
a reference to the story of Adam and Eve which like the film represents women
in the same foolish manor.
Websites used
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan's_Labyrinth
(For time period)
http://www.localhistories.org/womensrights.html
(To see women’s role during time era)
Monday, 29 October 2012
Micro essay
How does mise-en-scene, sound and cinematography construct meaning and
provoke a response in a sequence from fight club?
This sequence in fight club relies heavily on micro
features in order to set up enigmas and foreshadow events that will become
clear to the audience further into the narrative. The sequence opens with a
mid-shot, revealing the location and the protagonist. The background appears
out of focus, through the use of a shallow depth of field, drawing the
audience’s attention to Norton’s character, making him appear significant. The
lighting on the character highlights his face, however only on one side which
portrays he has two sides to him, a good and an evil one as black connotes evil
and white connotes innocence .I thought the fact the darkness was creeping over
his face more created an effect that the evil is starting to take over him and
his actions which made me question what was causing this to happen thus enigmas
were set up for the audience.
This sequence in fight club relies heavily on micro
features in order to set up enigmas and foreshadow events that will become
clear to the audience further into the narrative. The sequence opens with a
mid-shot, revealing the location and the protagonist. The background appears
out of focus, through the use of a shallow depth of field, drawing the
audience’s attention to Norton’s character, making him appear significant. The
lighting on the character highlights his face, however only on one side which
portrays he has two sides to him, a good and an evil one as black connotes evil
and white connotes innocence .I thought the fact the darkness was creeping over
his face more created an effect that the evil is starting to take over him and
his actions which made me question what was causing this to happen thus enigmas
were set up for the audience.
The character is dressed in a grey
shirt, which is scruffy looking due to the top buttons being undone and his tie
not being tied, the colour grey suggests to the audience that the character is
lonely or empty meaning a piece of him could be missing which creates an enigma
as to why he is alone. This combined with the effortless presentation suggests
he is filling his emptiness this could be due to the presence of his new friend.
The camera switches to reveal the other character, Pitt, by using the same mid-shot a comparison between the two characters is provoked, though it is made naturally, and they appear to be quite the opposite. Pitt’s character is dressed rebelliously wearing a red leather jacket which connotes danger and reflects his personality whereas Norton’s however appears to be a stereotypical office worker
Pitt’s character’s tone is strong and
serious, showing he has power and takes orders from no one. The fact he gives a
blunt command to the other character to ‘hit him’ shows already he is starting to
have control over him. His command confuses the audience, as it is unclear as
to why he would want to be hit, thus an enigma is created as the audience
question Pitt’s character. Norton’s character has a slight uncertainty in his
voice and tries to act as if Pitt’s character is joking by letting out an
unsure laugh, this reveals that he is uncomfortable with fighting but also
portrays that he is scared of causing trouble.
A similarity can also be identified
through the use of lighting; Pitt’s character also has his face half highlighted
which creates a connection between the characters, revealing both of them have
two sides to them. The fact the two characters are opposites also creates an
effect on the audience that they are the good and bad side of each other, this
effect caused by the lighting is used to foreshadow the ending of the film. The
characters are also placed symmetrically facing each other which gave me the
impression of looking in a mirror, which foreshadows they are the same person.
A beam of light can be seen heading
towards Pitt’s character, which creates an effect of the protagonist fuelling him,
allowing him to become more powerful by being in his presence. This is also the
key light in the scene which reveals s the power is strong.
Two bottles are seen being placed onto the ground. These two bottles are identical and symmetrically positioned like the characters were in the frame, and appear to represent the characters and how they are the same. However, this only becomes clear to the audience once it is revealed they are the same person. The fact Pitt’s character is placing the bottles had an effect on me as it seemed clear to that he holds the fate of both characters and shows how he has power over them. Combined with the fact the bottles are black glass show how fragile the characters relationship will soon become, and that their friendship will quickly be broken due the black having negative connotations of death which creates an enigma for the audience as they are intrigued to find out what will cause this deterioration . The colour choice also works as a way of foreshadowing later events, due to Norton’s character’s ego being destroyed in the end. Pleonastic sound is used as the bottles are placed, to heighten the tap of the glass. The use of this technique makes the bottles more significance and has an effect on the audience to realise they are important.
A white car has been placed behind Pitt,
which looks distinct due to the colour being emphasised by the darkness. the
colour white connotes innocence and purity and could reveal the character is leaving
it behind thus resulting in the loss of innocence, which reveals a theme of the
film, this could be due to his later actions or the fact he is wants violence
to commence.
Traffic disrupts the silence, which
resembles Norton’s character’s thoughts as he is being pressured, therefore resulting
in clashing thoughts similar to traffic. Once a punch is finally thrown, it
sounds weak as no non-diegetic sound has been added because the character was
hesitant and afraid of the consequences as it could turn into a full on fight.
This works in sync with Pitt’s character’s speech, which mentions how ‘hard it
is to start a fight’.
A sense of irony is created from the
punch as Pit was punched in the ear in front of the telephone box, an object used
for the characters to regain contact and Pitt’s character had listened to Norton’s
problem through it. This reveals that he will soon not be acknowledging the Norton’s
characters problems. A slight beat sound can be heard which has a tempo
increase, this resembles a heartbeat and creates an effect amongst the audience
of a build-up of adrenaline, which ties into the theme of violence.
The camera is at a high angle, allowing
the audience to look down on the characters. This makes them appear minuet and
draws attention to smoke emerging from the building, which is an omen and
suggests that the fight will result in something more dramatic happening such
as an explosion as smoke is the after math of an explosion. Again this is
used to foreshadow later events, which will occur in the film.
A two shot is used to display the characters, this is used to show the characters being in sync as they are performing the same action. It gives a sense of the characters personality and feelings as Pitt’s character is smoking, and smoke is associated with evil and the other character is drinking which is associated with depression. As a result of this shot I thought it was clear to see that Pitt’s character has created an impression on the other as they are acting almost identically, which portrays that Pitt’s character is able to change the other character, revealing to the audience he is manipulative.
Police sirens can be heard, this creates
an effect on the audience that the characters are soon to rebel against the law
thus indicating their violence is only going to progress into something with a
greater impact on society. Pitt’s character throws the bottle which shatters this
is a representation of the character not being real. Norton’s character copies
this action, which reveals he will destroy his alter ego.
All the micro features work together to create effects and enigmas for the audience. The lighting reveals the characters are participating in something slightly obscure due to it being low lit. The lighting is also used to create an impression of the characters as it affects both their faces, raising suspicion for the audience as distrust is created. Colour is used to give a sense of the characters personalities, for example Pitt’s red jacket provokes an impression of him being evil.
The use of sound is used to subliminally hint out future events, such as the police sirens as it allows the viewer to identify that something illegal is about to commence. I personally thought the micro features in this scene are used intelligently, as I can see how they impact the rest of the film such as the colour black being an indication of project mayhem and the glass bottles which work with the character position to reveal the protagonist being schizophrenic, which is the twist of the film and the fact this can be identified early in the film intrigues me.
Wednesday, 24 October 2012
Pleonastic and Foley sound example
This is an example of pleonastic and foley sound. To create pleonastic sound the sound of the footsteps was heightened creating more impact as I walked down the hall. The Foley sound consisted of an added heartbeat, and added breathing . We also added an editing technique, slow motion, to create suspense as I walked down the hall towards my death,
Friday, 19 October 2012
Is citizen Kane the greatest film ever made? Film review
Is citizen Kane
the greatest film ever made?
Citizen Kane opens with the viewing of an expensive looking building
which appears to be abandoned and lonely, this works in sync with the next
scene which portrays the death of a man, and snow globe that is seen deteriorating
as it crashes to the floor, the fact this is shown in a close up shot emphasis’s
the significance of the object making it seem sacred, this is a very obscure significance
however it foreshadows the end of the film as it represents his childhood and resembles the scene revealing Kane as a child. The whole life of the man the story
is based upon is revealed to the audience within the first five minutes of the
film through the showing of a film reel ,which makes the real storyline the
past of Kane, and how the events came together to create this story of
confusion. The film reel itself is a narrative device as it conveys the story’s
plot to the audience.
Citizen Kane follows the story of a group of reporters who
view the film reel, just as the audience do, which simply reveals the life of a
man named Charles Foster Kane, who is recently deceased, disappointment strikes
the reporters as it doesn't inform the reporters on the in-depth story of who
Kane really was. In a hope to discover the truth about this man they set off and
do a series of interviews on those who have been close to Kane throughout his
life to discover the mysterious ‘rosebud’, the dying words of Kane himself. In
a winded path of misleading factors the reporters struggle to discover the
truth, and the film consists of a chronological sequence of flashbacks of all characters
interviewed, with each interview comes an extra piece of the puzzle which
builds up to create the final truth of rose bud. Citizen Kane, an engaging and unpredictable
‘master piece’ realised in the early 1940’s, and often considered one of the
greatest films of all times, which with feedback alone so highly rated it
simply must be seen just to justify whether or not it deserves it’s places at
the top of the list. Is it really a true perfection created by an outstanding genius?
Or is it simply just another over rated disappointment lacking any form of
entertainment?
With Citizen Kane being realised in the 1940’s bad effects are expected, simply due to the lack of equipment available during the time period,
however this isn't the case with citizen Kane. Besides from the visually
viewable old fashioned look given by the camera the effects are well disguised
and reek with sophistication which leave the audience questioning how it
was really done due to it being truly remarkable, especially for it's time. This level of advanced effects is even suitable for
expectations of modern film. The main effect used throughout the film is a
simple dissolve to pass through a passage of time; this can be viewed in the
opening sequence as the camera tilts up to reveal an abandoned looking
building. This is a simple yet an effective form of cinematography as it looks
very professional and way ahead of its time without a great deal of effort,
this is just one of the things which makes you truly appreciate the film and creates an enigma for the audience as you watch in wonder of what it would be capable of
being like in if recreated in modern day cinema. A wonderful example of editing
in this film is elliptical editing, this is shown in a scene of Kane and his
wife and it reveals the deterioration of their relationship as they go from
star crossed lovers to none talking acquaintances, this is all shown through elliptical
editing as it allows you to see time pass by through the shots. The clothing
choice also emphasises the couple’s relationship as at first a real effort
seems to be put into both characters appearances and as time progresses their
costumes get more subtle and darker toned to represent the dying love.
Throughout the whole film Kane is often being portrayed in
front of fire, this creates an impression of the character being devilish and
evil, especially considering the candle lights in his home forms the shape of a
devils fork. Therefore I think the lighting has a dramatic effect on the
audience as it stands out with such precision, whether it is figures emerging from shadows or well-lit characters sitting in front of a homely fire. This is
an aspect of the film which I found truly outstanding and different to any film
I have ever seen, never have I spotted the lighting as the first key item in a
frame, but as the lighting is used to such intensity it portrays feelings,
emotions and even character personalities. A clear example of this is when Kane
hits his wife, she brightly highlighted making her seem angelic and strong
sympathy is felt for her, however Kane is shown to be almost completely obscured
by the lighting portraying his inner evil.
The same effect is also created with the use of cinematography,
it is used to see and feel obvious feelings, a good example of this is at the
first interview conducted by Thompson, the camera goes in through a shattered
window at a high angle, and the window in itself connotes depression and the
woman being broken emotionally, which fits the character as she is drinking
herself away at a lousy bar. The fact the high angle is used however show her vulnerability,
creating a feeling of sympathy for the character, which is outstanding as the
film can have an effect that strong simply through the use of a high camera
angle.
I thought the actor taking the role of Kane was done to surgical
precision, as the actor managed to portray Kane as a powerful and in control man,
who slowly loses control throughout his life, this is clearly shown towards the
end when he wrecks his room. I think this was the impression the director intended
to be shown due to the low angles being used to make Kane appear to have
authority and power, hence why the actor did an outstanding performance as the
character.
However although this film deserves a strong praise it also
has a high amount of negatives that must be touched upon, one is simply the
structure of the film. This is confusing and throws you off course and just doesn't have a strong enough sense of encouragement to make you want to find
your way through the maze of the story line. Unless you are fully aware of every
situation and realise you are watching a load of over used flash backs you will
experience a brain ache of bewilderment as you won’t understand if you are
seeing the same character at a different period of their life or if you are seeing
a completely new side of a story. The flash backs are slightly vague due to the
film being in black and white, and stereotypically in modern film a distortion
of colours will be shown as an effect indicating a flash back, this isn’t the
case in citizen Kane as you are blind when it comes to uncovering a flashback. The
flash backs are another form of a narrative device as it provides the audience
with a substantial amount of information with each and every one which all adds
to the plot.
Citizen Kane used a vast amount of extreme deep-focus photography which made everything in shot become significant, I found this to be a negative as it was too much information to take in and created an enigma as it resulted in curiously wondering where your eyes were supposed to be examining. On the other hand this was very artistic and worked powerfully to make the film unpredictable which made the ending seem more intriguing and mysterious. One scene in the film truly stood out, this is when Kane is being shown as a child. All is white, due to the snow, this connotes purity and happiness, however this is juxtaposed with the fact Kane is throwing snow balls at his mother’s building, and this allows the audience to see a sense of neglect from Kane's parents who seem to see him as a disturbance. The fact Kane is playing alone, with nothing but his sleigh also has a dramatic effect with the audience as it appears he was not given attention as a child, this is backed up by the fact his mother gives him up in this scene and also that his dad closes a the window on him which shows he wants to shut him out of his life. The deep focus photography is used here as his parents are discussing giving up Kane, who is clearly visible in the background and due to the brightly lit snow more attention is drawn to him. Once the film has come to an end a clearer understanding is provided as to why this scene is so powerful and important, this is due to the message behind Kane's life as even though he become rich and had all he desired he still died alone, longing for the memories of his childhood as they were the most special moments in his life.
Another negative was the unstructured perspective of who was
telling the story, this becomes a negative due to the flashbacks as each
character has their moment of telling the story and certain scenes are even replayed
at different angles to show others perspective, an example of this is at the
opera performance when two characters points of views are portrayed.
To summarize Citizen Kane it is a very artistic film, which challenged
the norm of 1940’s cinema and had a huge impact on films, although rather impressive it does have a strong
effect of boredom when there is a certain unawareness in the storyline,
especially considering the length of the feature which is to dragged out and too
much to handle in a single viewing. The film only starts to become intriguing
in the last ten minutes due to the journey finally coming to end and the
desperation of wanted to discover who rose bud was is finally at an end. The
fact the film takes the route of not ending in restoration makes it unique from
other 1940’s films which acted upon the films behalf to make it more
successful, however this still doesn't make up for the over devolvement of
story line never the less it is still as classic. The best part of this film
was how unpredictable the whole thing was as the whole way through rose bud wasn't at all expected to be an object of childhood which hold a greater and significant meaning to Kane himself, and a sense of realisation is felt by
the audience as finally everything adds up just from that one simple answer.Also, one of the final shots is a birds eye view of all the antiques Kane has collected over the years, this has a deeper meaning as it resembles Kane trying to fulfil the happiness in his life but even though the room is full it still seems so empty due to the lack of importance of the statues. This film deserves a spot on the best films list, however not the top spot as
even though it changed cinema it doesn't quite meet the standards and
expectations expected when watching ‘the greatest movie of all time’.
Thursday, 18 October 2012
Split screen example
Friday, 12 October 2012
Expand your mind - "dangerous" cinematic women studies
This article '
"Dangerous" cinematic women studies' is based on a feminist film theory
that consists of the explanation of how women are portrayed in film noir. The
women are referenced as 'femme fatale' which means an attractive or
seductive woman who brings disaster to any man who
becomes involved with her, this portrays that women were seen as
tools of seduction and the article informs this was due to their clothing and
the rest of their appearance. A clip is attached to the article
from a 1946 film and shows a woman dressed in an impressive tight black dress,
to emphasize her body features, performing a song and dance as she takes the
role of a character by the name of Gilda. In video it is revealed that the
dress the character wears is inspired by the painting 'Madame x' by John
singer Sargent. In the clip it is said that Gilda seems to be
'refashioning' the femme fatale, due to the dress being a modernized version of
the 'Madame X' dress, as Gilda's is strapless to fit into the 1940's fashion
trend and enhance the sense of pure attraction. The fact the dress is
being refashioned portrays that the characteristics of a 'femme fatale'
lives on, however it is adapted to fit the generation the film is set it,
telling the reader that this character is found in both modern and classic
film. I found this rather interesting as it was rather unusual to
discover inspiration from paintings being used in a more sophisticated way, in
this case a film, and being represented over 100 years later to create a
simple effect on how women can be dangerous in there ways of
seduction. I can see why that certain dress was chosen for the character Gilda,
due to it being revealing and in films it appears to be the only way for women
to get what they want, through their ways of promiscuity.
The article then continues
to inform the reader on the characteristics of the character Gilda
and explains how she has traces of mythical female figures such as 'Cleopatra',
this was another element of the article I found interesting due to the in depth analysis of
the character profile and the immense amount of thought put into the
construction of a single female character. It's also intriguing to have a taste
of the of the progress and effort which has gone into forming a character,
especially considering she isn't completely original and
has parts of females from all different eras constructed into her creation to
create a flawless femme fatale.
The article makes key
points on how women's roles in film noir are presented. It explains how women’s
roles of 'eternal victims' are challenged due to the themes running
throughout film noir such as violence, sexuality and pathology. This informs
the reader of females being rather underrated in cinema, as they are either
being portrayed as a victim, which connotes weakness and vulnerability, or as
attractive eye candy. The article also presents men as being 'paranoid', which
adds to the image of woman characters because by them being paranoid shows that
they are weary of the danger of women and what they can do to them both
emotionally and physically. It also portrays a certain weakness of men due to
them constantly falling for women, as seen in films, even though they
have full awareness of their plans of destruction.
The article
also informs the reader on film noire being rather predictable,
thus making it cliché and rather sexist. The fact
the writer quotes that the heroine dies a 'violent death'
conveys a message to the audience that stereotypically the female dies in
film noire, the fact the female dies leaves an impression of women being
unworthy as they are unable to live and it's almost like there death is a way
of symbolizing the wrong they have done by luring the men into there 'danger'.
After reading this article I got a sense of
realization as I immediately understood the character profile it was trying to
describe, the alluring female role that is always seen in detective films
lingering around in the males eye line and catching their attention every time.
I found this interesting due to the understanding I took away with me from the
descriptions given, I also liked how it made me think about femme fatale being
used in more modern circumstances of film as I can only picture the character
type staring in a 90's film. However due to the refashioning of the
character profile it makes spotting the character more obscure.
To conclude this article was interesting, descriptive
and factual, although the intensity of the language does slightly throw you of
course but never the less it is overly informative and covers every scrap of
information you need to know about the dangerous cinematic woman theory. It
includes visual representations of femme fatale and written, which together
cover the whole character profile, the theory, how women are portrayed and
provides examples to back up all the points made.
Words I didn't understand and definitions.
Rapacious - Aggressively greedy or grasping.
Manifest - Oblivious or clear to the eye or the mind.
Femme fatale - An attractive or seduction woman. She especially will bring disaster to a man who becomes involved with her.
Patriarchal - relating to, or characteristic of a patriarch or characteristic of a system of society or government controlled by men: "patriarchal values".
Film noir - A style or genre of a film which is marked by mood of pessimism, fatalism or menace. The term was originally applied to American thrillers ,or films of a detective genre, produced in the time period of 1944-1954.
Friday, 28 September 2012
Cinematography homework part 3
Tilt up - This is a vertical camera movement which consists of the
camera pointing upwards. This is most commonly used to reveal more
information about a setting or to introduce a character such as an appealing
female.
Tilt down - This is a vertical camera movement which consists of
the camera pointing downwards. This is used to reveal more information about
the setting.
Tracking - This is were a camera is placed on a track which
it can then move along to follow the action. This movement is used to
make the audience feel like they are a part of the action as they are able
to witness everything happening in the frame.
Dolly - This is where the camera is placed on a track and can move
around to follow the action. This shot is usually used as a way of getting
closer and further away from the subject. This shot is used to allow the viewer
to be part of the action and also reveal closer up information to the viewers
which couldn't be seen normally.
Crane - This is where the camera is placed on a crane to move
around in larger environments. This is used to show the location of a setting.
Handheld - This is where the camera is held by hand and uses no
form of structure to stay stable. This shot is usually used to show realism and
characters emotions and perspective.
Aerial/ birdseye - This is usually taken from a helicopter and is
a more flexible and smoother way of filming than with a crane. It used for
establishing shots to reveal the location and is often used during the opening
sequence of a film to introduce the setting.
Zoom - A zoom is a way of magnification, which allows us to see
things closer. This is used to change the position of the audience and can be
used at a very slow or fast pace.
Thursday, 27 September 2012
Cinematography homework task 2
Canted/ dutch tilt. |
Establishing shot |
Long shot |
Medium long shot |
Medium shot |
2. Long shot - A long shot is where the whole subject is usually seen and a lot of background space is visible. This shot would be used to show the surroundings to give a sense of the place and show characters in full view.
3.Extreme long shot/establishing shot- This shot consists of mainly the surroundings therefore the subject is usually not even visible. This shot is purely to show the surroundings/place. This shot can also be used if the contents of a sequence is very widely spread out.
4.Medium long shot- This shot usually shows most of a subject, preferably head to knees. This shot can be used to show some of the surroundings but still have character interactions in view.
5.Canted/Dutch tilt - This shot is where the camera is tilted to one side deliberately. This shot can be used for dramatic effects, and for various different feeling such as unease.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)