Is citizen Kane
the greatest film ever made?
Citizen Kane opens with the viewing of an expensive looking building
which appears to be abandoned and lonely, this works in sync with the next
scene which portrays the death of a man, and snow globe that is seen deteriorating
as it crashes to the floor, the fact this is shown in a close up shot emphasis’s
the significance of the object making it seem sacred, this is a very obscure significance
however it foreshadows the end of the film as it represents his childhood and resembles the scene revealing Kane as a child. The whole life of the man the story
is based upon is revealed to the audience within the first five minutes of the
film through the showing of a film reel ,which makes the real storyline the
past of Kane, and how the events came together to create this story of
confusion. The film reel itself is a narrative device as it conveys the story’s
plot to the audience.
Citizen Kane follows the story of a group of reporters who
view the film reel, just as the audience do, which simply reveals the life of a
man named Charles Foster Kane, who is recently deceased, disappointment strikes
the reporters as it doesn't inform the reporters on the in-depth story of who
Kane really was. In a hope to discover the truth about this man they set off and
do a series of interviews on those who have been close to Kane throughout his
life to discover the mysterious ‘rosebud’, the dying words of Kane himself. In
a winded path of misleading factors the reporters struggle to discover the
truth, and the film consists of a chronological sequence of flashbacks of all characters
interviewed, with each interview comes an extra piece of the puzzle which
builds up to create the final truth of rose bud. Citizen Kane, an engaging and unpredictable
‘master piece’ realised in the early 1940’s, and often considered one of the
greatest films of all times, which with feedback alone so highly rated it
simply must be seen just to justify whether or not it deserves it’s places at
the top of the list. Is it really a true perfection created by an outstanding genius?
Or is it simply just another over rated disappointment lacking any form of
entertainment?
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizrZbr1PkisISqoRkWnBDy2iEAdtZeDHsmt5QQ6izbACmnm0RQKS3FF3MH1iI7oyH4i-SVrLhe_r8RlD3r5gv7JHvM4_3RC1lWza34-ZER0y8CatwmPKTLK1UGBpKcNfon8dUDU0S6D3Y/s320/Screen+shot+2012-12-18+at+11.11.38+AM.png)
Throughout the whole film Kane is often being portrayed in
front of fire, this creates an impression of the character being devilish and
evil, especially considering the candle lights in his home forms the shape of a
devils fork. Therefore I think the lighting has a dramatic effect on the
audience as it stands out with such precision, whether it is figures emerging from shadows or well-lit characters sitting in front of a homely fire. This is
an aspect of the film which I found truly outstanding and different to any film
I have ever seen, never have I spotted the lighting as the first key item in a
frame, but as the lighting is used to such intensity it portrays feelings,
emotions and even character personalities. A clear example of this is when Kane
hits his wife, she brightly highlighted making her seem angelic and strong
sympathy is felt for her, however Kane is shown to be almost completely obscured
by the lighting portraying his inner evil.
The same effect is also created with the use of cinematography,
it is used to see and feel obvious feelings, a good example of this is at the
first interview conducted by Thompson, the camera goes in through a shattered
window at a high angle, and the window in itself connotes depression and the
woman being broken emotionally, which fits the character as she is drinking
herself away at a lousy bar. The fact the high angle is used however show her vulnerability,
creating a feeling of sympathy for the character, which is outstanding as the
film can have an effect that strong simply through the use of a high camera
angle.
I thought the actor taking the role of Kane was done to surgical
precision, as the actor managed to portray Kane as a powerful and in control man,
who slowly loses control throughout his life, this is clearly shown towards the
end when he wrecks his room. I think this was the impression the director intended
to be shown due to the low angles being used to make Kane appear to have
authority and power, hence why the actor did an outstanding performance as the
character.
However although this film deserves a strong praise it also
has a high amount of negatives that must be touched upon, one is simply the
structure of the film. This is confusing and throws you off course and just doesn't have a strong enough sense of encouragement to make you want to find
your way through the maze of the story line. Unless you are fully aware of every
situation and realise you are watching a load of over used flash backs you will
experience a brain ache of bewilderment as you won’t understand if you are
seeing the same character at a different period of their life or if you are seeing
a completely new side of a story. The flash backs are slightly vague due to the
film being in black and white, and stereotypically in modern film a distortion
of colours will be shown as an effect indicating a flash back, this isn’t the
case in citizen Kane as you are blind when it comes to uncovering a flashback. The
flash backs are another form of a narrative device as it provides the audience
with a substantial amount of information with each and every one which all adds
to the plot.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHzkiTV4xXAB-ikVYY_l_aLOUnrnS4BWZE92Hc0v1ZYGkhXEUaI3jDmrwsKs9KuLfADGMnIOuU9qPBlJHxVLDNFDVFnAhchiZZ3iErp2QOPnxzIeIC1a1YyyLp8mExzf91fUaZZWbmaY8/s320/Screen+shot+2012-12-18+at+11.12.56+AM.png)
Another negative was the unstructured perspective of who was
telling the story, this becomes a negative due to the flashbacks as each
character has their moment of telling the story and certain scenes are even replayed
at different angles to show others perspective, an example of this is at the
opera performance when two characters points of views are portrayed.
To summarize Citizen Kane it is a very artistic film, which challenged
the norm of 1940’s cinema and had a huge impact on films, although rather impressive it does have a strong
effect of boredom when there is a certain unawareness in the storyline,
especially considering the length of the feature which is to dragged out and too
much to handle in a single viewing. The film only starts to become intriguing
in the last ten minutes due to the journey finally coming to end and the
desperation of wanted to discover who rose bud was is finally at an end. The
fact the film takes the route of not ending in restoration makes it unique from
other 1940’s films which acted upon the films behalf to make it more
successful, however this still doesn't make up for the over devolvement of
story line never the less it is still as classic. The best part of this film
was how unpredictable the whole thing was as the whole way through rose bud wasn't at all expected to be an object of childhood which hold a greater and significant meaning to Kane himself, and a sense of realisation is felt by
the audience as finally everything adds up just from that one simple answer.Also, one of the final shots is a birds eye view of all the antiques Kane has collected over the years, this has a deeper meaning as it resembles Kane trying to fulfil the happiness in his life but even though the room is full it still seems so empty due to the lack of importance of the statues. This film deserves a spot on the best films list, however not the top spot as
even though it changed cinema it doesn't quite meet the standards and
expectations expected when watching ‘the greatest movie of all time’.
No comments:
Post a Comment